We've been using the MSI MPG 321URX QD-OLED exclusively as a productivity monitor for the last six months,关键字1 and it's time to check in to see how the panel is holding up in terms of burn-in. Not much has changed in how we've been using this monitor – we've really been pushing it with a worst-case usage scenario for OLED – but there have been a few changes compared to the last time we checked for burn-in.

If you missed the last two updates, we recommend going back and checking out at least the initial article to get an idea of the setup we're using and why we've chosen MSI's 4K 240Hz QD-OLED gaming monitor as our workstation display.

Essentially, the idea here is to perform a real-world test of OLED longevity in the worst possible configuration, effectively burning in the display on purpose. We swapped a 32-inch 4K IPS LCD for this new QD-OLED and changed nothing else about the setup – no dark mode, no screensavers, or anything like that – to see if OLED monitors can truly be used as LCD-equivalent productivity displays long-term.

I use my monitor more than 8 hours a day, sometimes continuously, with no breaks for the display to turn off and rest. This leads to hours upon hours of static usage in applications like web browsers, Microsoft Office (including Excel), and production tasks like Adobe Premiere and Photoshop. With virtually no content consumption and zero gaming in our daily use of this display, this is not how we recommend usingan OLED at all, though it's a use case that has been perfectly fine for LCDs for a long time.

After one month of usage, the MSI 321URX showed no signs of burn-in at all, which was expected. At that point, we'd used the monitor for about 200 to 250 hours. After three months, we started to see faint signs of burn-in, and by that time, we'd used the display for approximately 650 to 750 hours with 71 panel compensation cycles.

Six months into this experiment, we estimate the usage to be between 1,200 and 1,500 hours, and the monitor indicates that it has run 141 compensation cycles. This aligns with what we reported previously – about double the usage and about double the compensation cycles. We're still seeing around 9 to 10 hours of usage at 200 nits of brightness per compensation cycle.

As we mentioned in the last update, the recommended rate for panel protection cycles is every four hours, so in our typical usage, it's running less than half as often as is ideal. However, this is a totally realistic scenario for someone using this display for full-time work, especially if you don't put the monitor to sleep during breaks. We've set the display to sleep after two hours, which is far longer than we would recommend for general OLED use, but it's the same setting we used for our LCD.

• ·李雪琴暴瘦回归！《五十公里桃花坞5》七公里徒步社交破冰
• ·教孩子写作业气到爆的朋友圈文案 辅导孩子写作业的心情短句
• ·淮北市成立关爱流动儿童服务站
• ·万能沙雕评论美女语录 适合用来夸美女的语录
• ·青马课堂：想要马儿好，就要马儿少吃草
• ·Analyzing Graphics Card Pricing: July 2018
• ·Brennan Lee Mulligan on 'Dimension 20: Cloudward, Ho!' and bringing steampunk to the dome
• ·《想你在丽江》(贺金演唱)的文本歌词及LRC歌词
• ·崩坏3星际旅情记事簿活动怎么操作 星际旅情记事簿活动攻略
• ·期待！八一飞行表演队将在非洲首次飞行演出
• ·扮靓庭院，带来乡村“蝶变”
• ·新型朋友圈搞笑的旅游文案 旅游发圈会被秒赞的搞怪说说
• ·NBA总决赛赔率:雷霆呈一边倒 SGA比肩詹姆斯?
• ·以色列称袭击伊朗至少10名核科学家
• ·2021北京上林马术中央公园“上林”UP联赛第二站在秋雨中拉开战幕
• ·微软或将全面退出主机市场？机器可能全靠第三方厂商